The Old Sacramento Bridge

Montejo v. Louisiana: Police Interrogation Power Increased

Constitutional Rights to Legal Counsel and Against Self-Incrimination

The Supreme Court's ruling in Montejo v. Louisiana in 2009 expands law enforcement's power to interrogate people suspected of committing a crime, and highlights the need for people to guard their constitutional rights to legal counsel and against self-incrimination.

Montejo v. Louisiana (2009)

The case involved Jesse Montejo, who was arrested for the robbery and murder of Lewis Ferrari. When he was arrested, Montejo was advised of his Miranda rights, which he waived. When questioned by police, Montejo eventually admitted to committing the murder. At a subsequent hearing, Montejo was appointed a defense attorney since he couldn't afford to hire one. Before Montejo had the opportunity to meet with his lawyer, however, detectives approached him and convinced him to go with them as they searched for the murder weapon. Montejo was again advised of his Miranda rights. He nevertheless decided to accompany the detectives, and while in the car he wrote an apology letter to the victim's widow. Montejo finally met with his lawyer after he returned from the excursion with the detectives. Over the objections of Montejo's lawyer, the apology letter was introduced as evidence by prosecutors during trial. Montejo was found guilty and sentenced to death.

In his appeal, Montejo claimed that his Sixth Amendment right to legal counsel and Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination had been violated, and that police should not have been allowed to speak with him and convince him to join them on their search for evidence.

Increased Scope of Police Interrogation

The Supreme Court disagreed with Montejo and stated that by waiving his Miranda rights, Montejo had allowed police to continue talking with him and asking him to help look for evidence. Just because a defendant has been appointed legal counsel, the Court said, police are not prevented from trying to gather evidence. This power to investigate is not unlimited, however, the Court stated. Specifically, once a defendant invokes his Miranda right to legal counsel, police must stop their interrogation until a defense lawyer is present.

The Importance of Quality Legal Representation

Being arrested and facing criminal charges is a frightening experience. The Supreme Court's decision in Montejo highlights the necessity of having an experienced criminal lawyer to protect your rights. If you have questions about a police interrogation that you or someone you know was subjected to, call me at 916-442-1200 for a free and confidential consultation.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Nancy King was patient, persistent, and polite. She followed up and kept me informed, took a lot of the stress off of me. She was very instrumental in eventually getting the case against me dismissed. It was money well spent. Linda
★★★★★
My son's case involved felony theft and drug charges. We were thrilled when Nancy was able to obtain a dismissal on all charges. My son's now back on track with his career. Nancy is the kind of attorney who fights hard for her clients and actually cares about them. I recommend her highly. Shawn M.
★★★★★
Nancy King represented me on a DUI. I was involved in an accident and had a blood alcohol level of .13/.14. Nancy King kept pushing in the negotiation process. She was able to get me a wet reckless. Nancy King is someone you can trust. She knows what she's doing and works hard for her clients. I recommend her highly. D.V.
★★★★★
I was wrongfully targeted by the police for a felony offense. Nancy took care of everything for me and got the police to realize that they had made a mistake. Everything was handled promptly and professionally and I was able to protect my reputation. D.B.